![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Where are YOUR papers? Once upon a time, there was a
political party in Germany that decided that there was a group of people that
they could do without. Their first step
toward the eventual annihilation of six million of them was to propagandize
them as carriers of disease, or as dangerous subversives. The next step was to establish a national
classification system, which required everyone to carry papers indicating to
which demographic they belonged. Police
could check these papers on demand.
Once their undesirables were properly identified, a systematic takeover
of their property began. They were
disarmed -- threatened with incarceration or death if their weapons were not
turned in, and finally slaughtered on a scale never before seen in human history. Thankfully, in recent decades, the
call for a national identification system in the United States has been well in
the periphery of society. In 1971, the
Social Security Administration task force on the Social Security Number
rejected plans to extend the SSN to the status of a national ID card. The Federal Advisory Committee on False
Identification again rejected it in 1976.
The Carter, Reagan, and Clinton administrations repeatedly stated their
opposition to a national ID. Besides,
our state-issued driver licenses are already a de facto national ID, as they
are accepted as adequate identification for federal agencies. But we’ve got a new problem. The American population has become stark
raving mad because of the events of September that few were psychologically
prepared to deal with. “Terrorists” are
the new group of undesirables, and in order to weed them out, the debate about
a central database for national identification has once again been pushed into
the spotlight. Scarily, a poll released
by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press in the week following
the attacks suggest that seven of ten Americans now support the creation of a
national ID card. And this time, the
forces of evil want to do it right,
employing technologies that are summarized by our new word for the day: biometrics.
These include the collection of fingerprints, retina scans or other
unique identifiers that only you can carry in your body. These biometrics will link you to a federal
database containing demographic information about you, and likely a great many
other private tidbits. Larry Ellison, the horribly
misguided fool that happened to become CEO of Oracle, has offered to assist the
federal government in devising the national ID card system, even offering the
use of his company’s software at no charge.
Ellison contends that any privacy we may lose has already been lost,
shrugging off any notion that a national ID system will force us to surrender
our rights. Says Ellison in an
interview with KPIX-TV in San Francisco: This privacy you're concerned about is largely an illusion. All you have to give up is your illusions,
not any of your privacy. Right now, you can go onto the Internet and get a
credit report about your neighbor and find out where your neighbor works, how
much they earn and if they had a late mortgage payment and tons of other
information. Ellison
has provided details about his proposed system, which he claims will be
voluntary. People will be allowed to
refuse the card, but will be subject to a more rigorous search while
traveling. This reminds me of the
second-class oppression of the speedy-pay systems on the highways, where we get
to voluntarily wait behind the rest of the people paying with cash to avoid our
movements being tracked by a database.
Not that many people notice that going on either. Larry Ellison and Oracle
have been designing databases for almost thirty years. One of his first customers was the Central
Intelligence Agency. Where the hell was
Larry when we still had our privacy? Once again, the multitudes join the
call with their half-witted professions of squeaky-clean innocence. “Oh, I’m a law-abiding citizen, what do I
have to lose?” is the cry of the mainstream ignoramus. Listen, the government promised us – promised, pinky swore to God – that the
Social Security Act forbidding the use of the SSN for unrelated purposes would
be adhered to upon its inception. And
then they took a big dump on our heads over the next fifty years, ignoring it
and allowing the SSN to be in nearly every corporation’s database known to
computer-kind. The government abuses
its power. All governments, every
government. A great many civil libertarians are actually
flocking to the side of Ellison and his information-gathering Gestapo. Even civil rights expert Alan Dershewitz is
backing the idea, and that is when you know that mass insanity has stricken
your country. On the other hand, a more hopeful statement about ID
cards posted on the web site of the American Civil Liberties Union says, “A
national ID card would essentially serve as an internal passport. It would
create an easy new tool for government surveillance and could be used to target
critics of the government, as has happened periodically throughout our nation's
history.” Here are the important questions. Do you think any of this identification technology is going away after the “terrorists” are gone, and the world is once again safe for everyone? Do you think this is going to remain a voluntary system? Do you think this godforsaken species has a chance at saving itself from repeating history? Tune in next year for the answers. It’s coming, and fast. And this time, there will be no alliances in the world powerful enough to stop it. << Back to Main Page |
|||||